Posted by
Christine Gates on Friday, January 05, 2007 1:46:15 PM
orginally written Feb. 2, 2006
by Christine Gates
State of the Union: How will we pay
for it all?
Where do I start? I
see the idea of a “focused and smaller government” is lost on this President. In his one hour, address he proposed
$264,181,000,000 in increased
spending for the fiscal year (FY) 2007 alone.
That’s 264 BILLION DOLLARS for his three little ideas, not for the
entire federal budget or just one department or the war, but three ideas!
President Bush proposed three little ideas: an American Competitiveness Initiative
(education spending) $166,650,000; Affordable
and Accessible Health Care Initiative $97,710,000,000; an Advanced Energy Initiative $821,000,000.
All totaling $264.181 billion only for
FY2007, but if you run the numbers out over 15 years (and ending limited programs
as scheduled) he is proposing that we spend $2,518,121,000,000 or $2.5 trillion
just on these three ideas of education, health care, alternative energy. Wow!
How will we pay for this?
While laying out his ideas of the American Competitive Initiative, he called No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a “success” and he wants all of us,
including Congress, to support him in building
on it. I do not know what country Bush
is doing his education research on, but it is not America,
because as far as I know, No Child Left
Behind is an abysmal failure. While
its intentions were good, it is doing almost the exactly opposite of its stated
goals. I’ve heard NCLB sarcastically
called No Child Gets Ahead. And now… he wants to dump an additional $445,500,000,000 into it
over the next 15 years. That is an
insane policy.
NCLB is the obstacle for any complaint in school. Everyone within the bureaucracy of public
schools points to NCLB as the scapegoat, they pass the buck, and say their
hands are tied because of NCLB legislation.
I do not know if it is true, but that is the excuse from everyone.
Since NCLB, there is no accountability in schools, the
schools teach to the EOC or EOG tests, and the schools are not teaching kids to
think only how to take standardized tests. Too much time is spent on how to guess which
multiple-choice answer is the best when preparing for the tests.
No thanks! I’ll pass
on building on that kind of success and hope that the government can find
something better to do with my hard-earned tax dollars. We cannot afford this one.
Next, he wants us to develop energy alternatives in his Advanced Energy Initiative. Well, his proposed cost for that is only
$2.621 billion over the next 10 years. I
applaud that and hope he can get that legislation passed this year.
He stated bravely, “We have a serious problem: America
is addicted to oil, which is imported from unstable parts of the world.” He wants to cut oil importation by 75% and
spend a lot of money on R&D for alternative fuels for our homes, offices,
and cars. Great! Git’R done.
I do have some advice to go along with it though. Open Anwar in Alaska,
drill off the coasts of Florida
and California because we, too,
are an oil rich country. Allow more
refineries to be built to handle our own petroleum needs domestically or
develop new alternatives. Either one is
better than buying from countries who are unfriendly, to say the least, to America
(i.e., Venezuela,
Saudi Arabia, Mexico).
The use, or threat of use, of domestic oil or alternative
fuels will produce an intermestic policy (a domestic policy that has
international ramifications) that will do one of two things:
1) “Help”
those countries behave better towards the U.S.
because they will lose billions of dollars in revenue if we stop buying their
“unfriendly” oil. (Leverage)
2) Their
economies will collapse and they will become irrelevant like the USSR
if they are not in line with our
hegemony (philosophy).
Both are great foreign policy tools and better than war.
The Affordable and Accessible Health Care
Initiative was thrown around, too.
(I am so tired of perpetual health care whining.) He had some simple sounding solutions for that, too.
Electronic medical records scares the bejeebers out of
me! First, everyone will have to be
micro-chipped for it to work most efficiently.
Can you say Big Brother? If you
are worried about identity theft regarding your financial records, now, hang
on. How much would someone pay to get your clean bill of health? How hard would it be to get it back?
Bush proposes a nice little $3,000 tax credit for families
earning $25,000 or less to set up a medical savings account and/or buy a low
cost insurance plan. I spent some time
researching this gem. It turns out there
are 32 million households who earn less than $25,000, multiply it by $3000 (because
it will come to them in the form of a payment from the government since families
at this income level don’t usually pay very much, if anything at all) you
arrive at an astonishing figure of $96,000,000,000 for FY2007 alone. $2,070,000,000,000 over 15 years just to fund
this one tax credit program, a government hand out.
“Dole for the proles” brought the Great Roman Empire
down. Look it up. $2.07 trillion
for one little program because the proles are clamoring for more and more! How will we afford this? How will our grandchildren afford this? The only way this could possibly be affordable
is by eliminating Medicaid all together and replacing it with this proposal.
At length, he discussed the War on Terror, which he called A Strong American Leading the World but
gave no estimates of costs. We must
afford this at any price, it is our children’s freedom. Remember, the terrorists want us all dead
because we are the Great Satan, the
Infidel. They have no desire to
peacefully co-exist with us, if we are to believe their own rhetoric, and we
should.
Bush reminded Congress eloquently that “Hindsight is not
Wisdom.”
The topic in the speech called A Strong America Leading the World made me think of how America
is the beacon of the light for the rest of the world. A Strong
America Leading the World is similar to Ronald Regan’s vision of American
as “A shining city upon a hill.” We were
the light for the oppressed people of the Soviet Union
whom we led out of communism.
Lastly, the President asked Congress specifically for the
power of the pen, the Line Item Veto. Other presidents made use of such a tool, but
it is granted to the president by Congress for only short periods of time.
With such a power, a president can cut out riders, or
port-barrel-spending, in any bill he signs into law. Sometimes riders, or pork, is added or heaped
onto a really important bill that Congress knows the President is going to sign
no matter what. There can be dozens or
hundreds of riders tacked onto a bill that cost all of us billions and billions
of dollars each year in waste like the Hickory
Tea Pot Museum. I believe any president should have this
power. It is the only way to afford these more important programs.
Contact your Congressman about all of these issues. Let them know what you think. Everyone’s
opinion matters. America
is a representative democracy – tell your
representative what matters to you. Get
involved, even if you don’t agree with me.
www.senate.gov
www.house.gov
www.whitehouse.gov